Crime & Retribution

I was distressed to read recently that there is an on-line petition to parliament in which people are calling for the re-introduction of the death penalty in this country. The demand for such a final and decisive measure of retribution is, I feel, an indication that people are not so much interested in seeing justice served as in seeking vengeance for its own sake. Licensed killing by the state can serve no other purpose. Surely it is indisputable that, in matters of life and death, reason must always triumph over emotion. It is inconceivable that our anger (no matter how righteous) or cost considerations, for the love of goats (surely we’ve all heard the “Why should we pay for these people to be imprisoned?” rant), might ever actually allow us to feel entitled to even consider legitimising the taking of a human life.

The fundamental principle which the “bring back hanging” brigade don’t seem to have grasped is that all life is precious – and more precious than any bloody price-tag too. The call for a return to barbarism (which is all that such a retrograde step as the re-introduction of licensed killing by the state could ever be considered) is nothing but a pitiable indicator of the crumbling of the mores of our society. Civilisation is dependent upon us not giving in to our base instincts of rage but instead seeking reasoned and rational responses to all situations as they arise. The alternative is as violent as it is ugly.

The application of justice and the use of imprisonment should only be about the rehabilitation of offenders and the protection of the public through the containment of those who transgress laws. The treatment of those convicted and the mercy shown to them is an indicator of a society’s maturity and wisdom. As such, it should be cherished, because it’s one of the very few that we have left.

Giving vent to bloodlust is symptomatic of a social psyche which has become enraged, intolerant and unforgiving. Sadly, in recent times this has been showcased quite extensively – those signing the death penalty petition, the recent scenes of rioters and looters on our streets, the reactionary idea of pacifying those rioters using plastic bullets, even the calls for bankers to be flayed and tortured (or perhaps that last was just me). We seem to be caught in a maelstrom of blame and hatred that could too easily spiral out of control. This is a dangerous path for us to start down because it could put our way of life at threat; we could be on the verge of willingly sacrificing all that makes us free and enlightened or we could – nay, should – take stock and turn away from the temptation of extreme reactions. Let’s hope that we still have the strength and wisdom to make the right choices. Never say die.


About Fles

Early middle-aged (oh yes I am!), no longer long-haired but still speccy and decidedly still an increasingly opinionated git. I’m basically a believer in individualism, that everybody has their own perspective and inner-beauty. I try to find humour in every situation. I enjoy reading and writing poetry.
This entry was posted in Politics, Society and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Crime & Retribution

  1. william wallace says:

    The death penalty’s not being called for by politicians against the public. It’s a public cry for the death penalty against politicians.

  2. lindylou100 says:

    Well said, as usual Jules x

  3. Peter Claridge says:

    Perhaps if the life sentence meant life the desire by some to bring back the death penalty wouldn’t be so great. Isn’t intolerance just a by-product of tolerance?

    Reason must always triumph over emotion is an easy thing to state, but much harder to put into practice when put to the ultimate test. Does anybody have the right to tell the parent of a murdered child how to react?

    Have we become more free and enlightened since the abolishment of the death penalty in 1969? Would its unabolishing (?) make us any more barbaric than we already are? The path of hatred and blame has been well trodden by civilisation since its inception (whenever that was) even the place we’re all supposed to have derived from is aptly named the Great Rift Valley.

    So on balance, I agree that it would be wrong to re-introduce the death penalty but feel that the bankers should have been hung drawn and quartered. Reason shouldn’t always win.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s